Listen to this article|
Case Name |
Field of Law |
Held |
|
Noy
Vallesina Engineering SpA v. Jindal Drugs Limited & Ors. |
Arbitration |
Proceedings
under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation act not maintainable against
foreign award |
|
Gajendra
Sharma v. Union of India |
Constitutional
Law |
The government must ensure that
all steps be taken to implement the decision so that benefit percolates to
those for whom the financial benefits have been envisaged |
|
Gursimran
Singh Narula v. Union of India |
Constitutional
Law |
Supreme
court issues directions to health authorities for preventing the use of
disinfectants on people under the regulations to curb covid-19. |
|
Madras
Bar Association v. Union of India |
Constitutional
Law |
Supreme
court issued directions to the government and ordered to amend the provisions
of Tribunal Rules, 2020. |
|
Arnab
Manoranjan Goswami v. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. |
Constitutional
Law |
Arnab
goswami got bail from supreme court |
|
M/S
Kaledonia Jute and Fibres Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Axis Nirman and Industries Ltd. |
Corporate
Law |
The
transferability of winding up proceedings will depend upon the stage at which
they are pending before the high court |
|
Shri
Ram Sahu (dead) Through Lrs. & Ors. v. Vinod Kumar Rawat & Ors. |
Civil
Procedure Code |
Powers
of review under Section 114 Civil Procedure Code cannot be exercised as an
inherent or appellate power |
|
M/S
Imperia Structures Ltd. v. Anil Patni and Anr. |
Civil
Procedure Code |
Section
79 of the RERA act does not in any way bar the commission or forum under the
provisions of the consumer protection act to entertain any complaint. |
|
Rattna
Singh v. Nirmal Gill |
Evidence
Act |
A
document is presumed to be genuine if it is registered and the onus to prove
otherwise is on the person who challenges the said registered document |
|
Rajnesh
v. Neha |
Family
Law |
Supreme
court issued guidelines regarding payment of maintenance |
|
C. Bright v. The District Collector & Ors. |
SARFAESI
Act |
Section
14 of the SARAFAESI Act, 2020 is a directory provision; the remedy under
Section 14 does not become redundant if DM is unable to take possession of
secured assets within time limit |
|
UMC
Technologies Private Ltd. v. Food Corporations of India |
Misc. |
Without
clear intention in show cause notice to blacklist the entity, the decision
making authority cannot blacklist an entity |
|
Kirpa
Ram (Deceased) through Legal Representatives & Ors. v. Surendra Deo Gaur
& Ors. |
CPC |
The
High Court is not Obliged to Frame Substantial Question of Law, in case, it
finds no error in the findings recorded by the First Appellate Court. |
|
Tej
Bahadur v. Shri. Narendra Modi |
Representation
of Peoples Act, |
If
a person has not filed his nomination in accordance with Section 33(3) of the
Representation of Peoples Act, 1951, he cannot claim to be a duly nominated
candidate. |